Engaging families and consumers in advisory roles or capacities is a worthwhile investment for programs. Working with families and consumers at this level solidifies one's commitment and begins to shift from 'engagement' to 'partnership.' When programs prioritize the experiences of those they serve, take their input under advisement, and make programmatic decisions based on that with that input, this demonstrates that a program is committed to providing person- or family-centered services.
Just as the previous section described, this can help you know the services will be utilized by the population they are intended for, but in a more robust way. This is certainly not as common as engaging for input, but it is not uncommon to engage those with lived experiences in groups referred to as committees, councils, boards, etc. Engaging in this way does require more preparation and commitment on behalf of the agency/organization, and more follow-up on the part of the family/consumer.
Providing either ongoing engagement opportunities, or one-time events, help families and consumers feel heard and listened to. Providing space for feedback and ideas builds trust and partnership within the communities you serve. In general, we've heard from families they love to give feedback on their experiences - both good and bad. However, often they only reach out to share when things did not work out so well - but many have expressed a desire (and joy) in also sharing the difference the services they received made in their lives. Creating advisory opportunities within your agency provides the space for that to happen.
Engaging in advisory roles also creates space to establish organizational champions in the community. If you take family and consumer feedback with an open and honest mindset - your program will be able to build and sustain in ways that profoundly impact those who use it. This can also bring empower families and consumers while strengthening your program or agency.
In general, there are two types of advisory roles: self and system. The distinction is slight, but ultimately with regard to the initiative, it comes down to focus. The difference is if the focus of the group is specific to an issue, condition, or population (self) or broad and includes many issues, conditions, or populations (system).
Example | Advisory - Self | Advisory - System |
---|---|---|
Bureau of Family Health Family Advisory Council | Members represent their own experiences within population-specific work groups to drive change related to a particular population (e.g., children with special health care needs) or objective (e.g., well-woman preventive medical visits) | Work Group Members make up a larger group of families who will collectively discuss and advance broader systemsrelated issues (e.g., social determinants of health, workforce development, system policies) |
Medicaid System | Home and Community Based Service (HCBS) Member Work Groups: Members represent their families' experience regarding the services provided to inform and improve services within a specific waiver program. (specific population) | Managed Care Organizations (MCO) Member Advisory Groups: Members represent their families' experience to with that specific MCO to improve services provided through that MCO. (general population) |
Head Start | Local Head Start Policy Councils: parents have a voice in making program budget decisions, classroom activities, and community partnerships (local community) | Head Start Association Board of Directors: Parents serve alongside professionals in a governance role for the KS Head Start Association (broad state programming) |
Engaging in an advisory capacity can look differently based upon your goals, organizational structure, capacity, and community. Some examples include:
All experiences, both personal and professional, add value to an organization. Establishing and building rapport is essential to make lasting change. Building rapport includes viewing families and consumers as equals among staff and professionals and recognizing their preferences. For example, families have expressed feeling “less than” their professional peers in interdisciplinary advisory situations. One way to address this is to refer to them as a “Member” as a standard of practice, at least until you confirm their preference. These things, and the following tips, will help assure families feel their engagement is authentic and genuine - not simply to “check a box” for a grant requirement or “lip service” for community perception.
Ultimately, there is not a “one size fits all” approach when it comes to engaging in an advisory role. Maintaining a focus on strengths and skills provides space to celebrate the families and consumers and show how their engagement and involvement is making a difference for the organization and those you serve. The mantra of “Do for. Do with. Cheer On.” describe the overarching goals in including family and consumers in advisory roles, however in the reverse order. Through cheering on, supporting, and encouraging families and consumers to engage in your organization, you will build partnerships to work together, collaborate to establish and enhance programs to provide services most necessary and valuable to your target population.